Difference Between Managed Services and Staff Augmentation

Knowing More About Managed Services and Staff Augmentation

There is considerable interest in examining the feasibility of transitioning staff augmentation engagements to Managed Services. Managed Services, broadly defined as a third party that manages a service for a business with agreed-upon measurable outcomes, promises to increase cost savings and efficiencies by giving the supplier more control of a process. Staff augmentation also provides benefits, such as a flexible workforce and quick access to knowledge for short engagements. Should organizations abandon staff augmentation totally, the practice of “augmenting” resource gaps with external resources? What are the benefits and drawbacks of each model? What hazards do these approaches entail? Let us explore.

What are Managed Services, and What Do They Entail?

A managed service put is a service that manages the day-to-day operations of your specialized applications. A managed service can handle a wide range of duties. To begin with, it can provide more capabilities to your company’s end-users. It can also free up in-house IT resources to focus on higher-priority IT projects. Managed services are also designed to free up your workers’ time so they may focus on your company’s core competencies.

The quality of IT service or custom it solutions offered to your company declines when IT specialists notice a drop in the existing reservoir of knowledge. Managed services are necessary at this point. A lack of achievement in specific sectors due to a lack of service and a high volume of service breakdowns and downtime are other indicators that a managed service is required. Managed services may be an option if a startup’s budget is overspent on performance-degrading software updates. Data loss due to a lack of solutions could be another reason for a managed service.


Time to Hire is Reduced

Because of the extensive range of abilities available, notably in Ukraine, hiring time substantially decreases. According to the most recent survey, more than 55% of software developers are willing to leave their jobs for a higher wage or a more fruitful collaboration.

It means that “our minds” are constantly working to improve ourselves, resulting in a constant stream of acting competition among creators at all levels. This is beneficial since, by utilizing the globe mind bank, a client organization can be adaptable to any situation and be aware that we can provide it swiftly and for any length of time if additional expertise is required.

Benefits From an Economic Point of View

Everyone wants to save money, especially when deciding between a managed services model and personnel augmentation. This is not surprising because the goal is to identify cheaper contractors without decreasing or weakening the qualifying force. Is this even conceivable? Our answer is a resounding YES! Using the augmented strategy in 2022, according to Forbes, is a terrific notion for every corporate society.

The economic appeal of developers, such as those from Ukraine, is closely tied to the population’s standard of life. Our country has highly qualified individuals and a significant competitive advantage for enterprises that utilize our well-considered collaboration strategy. As a result, Ukrainian firms are substantial providers of staff augmentation and managed services, far ahead of the US and Canada.

Flexibility in Hiring

When comparing staff augmentation to managed services, the former allows you to feel at ease with the system of “connecting or disconnecting” an expert you require. That’s fantastic because it eliminates the need for additional fees and taxes upon hiring.

Your job is to choose an expert you require right now, and we will locate the most excellent potential match. Give us a month’s notice if you no longer need an expert. This method gives you the most flexibility and convenience. What is more, required to launch the project correctly? There is a sense of security and assurance that staff augmentation is the best option for you.


Before starting staff augmentation, you must assess all of the model’s potential drawbacks.

The Final Result is in Your Hands

The ultimate result is the main distinction between managed services and staff augmentation. Monitoring is an integral part of this model, and you are solely accountable for the project’s outcome.

You must be ready to address current concerns and delegate responsibilities for technical matters. At first view, these issues appear to be massive, and your hair seems swollen from the torrent of charge dropping on your shoulders.

Monitoring is Critical

Except for working hours and responsibilities, the procedure is totally under your control because the plan does not include a recorded agreement on the level of service. You must maintain control over the process to ensure that your staff does only the required jobs.

What is Staff Augmentation, and How Does it work?

Staff augmentation is an outsourced option for bringing in the skill sets your company needs at a lower cost. Your company will manage your augmented individuals as employees but with fewer hiring and maintenance costs and obligations. Staff augmentation is commonly used to fill a short-term need for a specific resource.

Staff augmentation is a type of outsourcing service in which a software company engages outside engineers on a “time and materials” basis. In actuality, the outsourcer’s internal team is supplemented (or wholly made up of) third-party professionals who work on the buyer’s premises throughout the project.

Businesses can save money on recruiting, payroll services, and project implementation using staff augmentation. This strategy is also very scalable: dissolving a partnership is far easier than ending an employment contract. Thus full-time workers may be cut (or increased) quickly if needed.


Helping you Save Time

In terms of productive time management, this approach aids the client in conserving their time capacity. You’ve outsourced your product to a managed services provider, so you don’t have to worry about intermediate deliverables or meeting deadlines. You can devote your time to more productive marketing.

Opportunity for Growth

You own a very profitable business, but you’ve never used internet systems before and don’t have a development team. You’re undecided about which road to choose, but you want to be confident in your ability to keep up with present trends. If a group of competent specialists does the task, this model will allow you to save time and effort.


Reliability of the Vendor

This is the system’s leading and most serious flaw. While using SA, your “home” managers have stable control, and MS has an “out” vendor. You must have faith in the organization by providing them with complete management power. You won’t be able to see the intermediate result, after all.

The costs are Higher

When we compare the expenses of staff augmentation to managed services, the difference is clear. Management corporations take risks, so the fee is significantly higher. Managed capacity vs. staff augmentation is more than justifiable in this case.

What Should You Do If You Can’t Decide Between Staff Augmentation and Managed Service?

Staff Augmentation

Staff augmentation is the most excellent option if you manage a small-medium business. This is because you will not be required to invest in operational costs. Additionally, because most augmented professionals work remotely or from constrained workplaces, you may be able to economize on infrastructure costs. Furthermore, you might add or subtract specialists based on your needs, ensuring that your permanent team members are always paid, even during your organization’s lean periods.

Managed Services

If you merely intend to begin a business, managed services are excellent. If you lack domain expertise, are unaware of how a specific industry operates, have no idea about delivery models or workforce, managed services can run your entire organization. You may stop micromanaging your resources and concentrate on what matters to your business.


Due to the fact that no two businesses are identical, it is critical to decide which IT outsourcing model is best suited to your business’s specific needs. Utilize the advantages and disadvantages listed above to evaluate staff augmentation vs. managed services and choose which option best fits your business model.

Both of these ways of IT outsourcing save you time and energy by eliminating the need to acquire the specialists required to build your goods and accomplish your company’s goals.

Scroll to Top